Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repo.saocamilo-sp.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2080
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMartimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabreraen_US
dc.contributor.authorPacheco, Rafael Leiteen_US
dc.contributor.authorBagattini, Ângela Mariaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPadovez, Roberta de Fátima Carreira Moreiraen_US
dc.contributor.authorAzevedo, Luciano Cesar Pontesen_US
dc.contributor.authorRiera, Rachelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-20T15:14:13Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-20T15:14:13Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationMartimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al. “Vitamin C-based regimens for sepsis and septic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.” Journal of Critical Care, vol. 71, outubro de 2022, p. 154099. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154099.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0883-9441-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.saocamilo-sp.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2080-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: to critically appraise and synthesize the evidence on the effects of vitamin C-based regimens for patients with sepsis or septic shock. Methods: a broad search was performed on May 2021 to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing vita min C-based regimens as adjuvant therapy for adults with sepsis or septic shock. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias table to assess the methodological quality of the included RCTs and the GRADE approach to evaluate the evidence certainty. Results: We included 20 RCTs (2124 participants). Evidence from low to very low certainty showed that vitamin C compared to placebo may reduce all-cause mortality up to 28 days (relative risk [RR] 0.60, 95% confidence inter val (CI) 0.45 to 0.80, 4 RCTs, 335 participants). Considering the other comparisons (vitamin C alone or combined with thiamine and/or hydrocortisone, compared to placebo, standard care or hydrocortisone), there were a little to no difference or very uncertain evidence for adverse events, SOFA score, ICU length of stay, acute kidney injury, mechanical ventilation- and vasoactive drugs-free days up to 28 days. Conclusion: Further RCTs with higher methodological quality, an increased number of participants and assessing clinically relevant outcomes are needed to provide better decision-making guidance.-
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of critical care, v. 71, 2022en_US
dc.subjectSepseen_US
dc.subjectChoque sépticoen_US
dc.subjectÁcido ascórbicoen_US
dc.subjectRevisão sistemáticaen_US
dc.titleVitamin C-based regimens for sepsis and septic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.en_US
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicoen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154099-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos de Periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.