Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repo.saocamilo-sp.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2078
Título: Timing of oxytocin administration to prevent post-partum hemorrhage in women delivered by cesarean section: a systematic review and metanalysis
Autor(es): Torloni, Maria Regina
Siaulys, Monica
Riera, Rachel
Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera
Pacheco, Rafael Leite
Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira Cruz
Widmer, Mariana
Betrán, Ana Pilar
Palavras-chave: Ocitocina
Hemorragia pós-parto
Cesárea
Revisão sistemática
Metanálise
Data do documento: 2021
Editor: Public Library of Science
Citação: Torloni, Maria Regina, et al. “Timing of oxytocin administration to prevent post-partum hemorrhage in women delivered by cesarean section: a systematic review and metanalysis”. PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no 6, junho de 2021, p. e0252491. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252491.
Resumo: Background: There is no consensus on the best timing for prophylactic oxytocin administration during cesarean section (CS) to prevent post-partum hemorrhage (PPH). Objectives: Assess the effects of administrating prophylactic oxytocin at different times during CS. Methods: We searched nine databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT). We pooled results and calculated average risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used GRADE to assess the overall evidence certainty. Results We screened 13,389 references and included four trials. We found no statistically significant differences between oxytocin given before versus after fetal delivery on PPH (RR 0.60, 95%CI 0.15–2.47; 1 RCT, N = 300) or nausea/vomiting (RR 1.21, 95%CI 0.69–2.13; 1 RCT, N = 300). There was a significant reduction in the need for additional uterotonics when oxytocin was given immediately before uterine incision versus after fetal delivery (RR 0.37, 95%CI 0.18–0.73; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs; N = 301). Oxytocin given before fetal delivery significantly reduced intra-operative blood loss (MD -146.77mL, 95%CI -168.10 to -125.43; I2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, N = 601) but did not change the incidence of blood transfusion (RR 0.50, 95%CI 0.13–1.95; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, N = 301) or hysterectomy (RR 3.00; 95%CI 0.12–72.77; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, N = 301). One trial (N = 100) compared prophylactic oxytocin before versus after placental separation and found no significant differences on PPH, additional uterotonics, or nausea/vomiting. Conclusions In women having pre-labor CS, there is limited evidence indicating no significant differences between prophylactic oxytocin given before versus after fetal delivery on PPH, nausea/vomiting, blood transfusion, or hysterectomy. Earlier oxytocin administration may reduce the volume of blood loss and need for additional uterotonics. There is very limited evidence suggesting no significant differences between prophylactic oxytocin given before versus after placental separation on PPH, need for additional uterotonic, or nausea/vomiting. The overall certainty of the evidence was mostly low or very low due to imprecision. Protocol: CRD42020186797.
URI: http://repo.saocamilo-sp.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2078
ISSN: 1932-6203
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos de Periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.