Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repo.saocamilo-sp.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1686
Título: Influence of heat and moisture exchanger use on measurements performed with manovacuometer and respirometer in healthy adults
Autor(es): Lucato, Jeanette Janaina Jaber
Cunha, Thiago Marraccini Nogueira da
Rocha, Sara Solange Oliveira Costa
Carvalho, Fernanda Maria Palmieri de
Botega, Daniele Cristina
Torquato, Jamili Anbar
Gimenes, Ana Cristina
Righetti, Renato Fraga
Palavras-chave: Pressões respiratórias máximas
Data do documento: 2016
Editor: Hindawi
Citação: Lucato, Jeanette Janaina Jaber, et al. “Influence of heat and moisture exchanger use on measurements performed with manovacuometer and respirometer in healthy adults”. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, vol. 11, no 1, dezembro de 2015, p. 1. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-015-0037-9.
Resumo: Background: The use of evaluation tools such as the manovacuometer and respirometer is frequent and disinfection is usually limited to the external surfaces, which is insufficient and raises concerns because of the potential spread of infectious diseases. Hydrophobic heat and moisture exchangers (HME) are used in mechanical ventilation and have microbiological filters, which can possibly reduce contamination, increasing the safety of related procedures. It is unknown, however, if the addition of an exchanger affects the measurements obtained. Aim of this study was to verify if the use of an HME interferes in maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures assessed using the manovacuometer and vital capacity evaluated using the respirometer in healthy adults. Methods: A controlled transversal trial was carried out. Twenty healthy young adults were included in the study. Vital capacity by respirometer and, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) were assessed with and without the use of HME. Results: No significant difference was found between the values pre and post HME use in vital capacity measurements: (3878.8 ± 202.2 mL vs. 3925.5 ± 206.0 mL, p = 0.116) and therespiratory muscle strength measurements: MIP (−99.0 ± 8.9vs −95.5 ± 9.0 cm H2O, p = 0.149) and MEP (92.5 ± 7.5 vs 92.5 ± 7.7 cm H2O, p = 1.0) respectively.Conclusion: We conclude that the use of HME does not modify the lung volumes or respiratory muscle strength, and can be used in order to reduce the occurrence of pulmonary infection.
URI: http://repo.saocamilo-sp.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1686
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos de Periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.