Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repo.saocamilo-sp.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1683
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorMata, Kyannie Risame Ueda daen_US
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Rafaela Cristina Monicaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarbone, Ébe dos Santos Monteiroen_US
dc.contributor.authorGimenez, Márcia Mariaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBortolini, Maria Augusta Tezellien_US
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Rodrigo Aquinoen_US
dc.contributor.authorFitz, Fátima Faníen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-26T19:47:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-26T19:47:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationMata, Kyannie Risame Ueda da, et al. “Telehealth in the Rehabilitation of Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: A Systematic Literature Review”. International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 32, no 2, fevereiro de 2021, p. 249–59. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04588-8.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1433-3023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repo.saocamilo-sp.br:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1683-
dc.publisherSpringer Linken_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational urogynecology journal, v. 32, p. 249–259, 2021en_US
dc.subjectTelemedicinaen_US
dc.subjectDiafragma da pelveen_US
dc.subjectIncontinência urináriaen_US
dc.subjectSaúde da mulheren_US
dc.titleTelehealth in the rehabilitation of female pelvic floor dysfunction: a systematic literature reviewen_US
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicoen_US
dcterms.abstractIntroduction and hypothesis The pandemic caused by coronavirusdisease 2019 (COVID-19) increased the awareness and efforts to provide care from distance using information technologies. We reviewed the literature about the practice and effec tiveness of the rehabilitation of the female pelvic floor dysfunction via telehealth regarding symptomatology and quality of lifeand function of pelvic floor muscles (PFM).Methods A bibliographic review was carried out in May 2020 in the databases: Embase, Medline/PubMed, LILACS and PEDro. A total of 705 articles were reviewed after the removal of duplicates. The methodological quality of the articles was evaluated bythe PEDro scale. Two authors performed data extraction into a standardized spreadsheet. Results Four studies were included, two being randomized controlled trials. Among the RCTs, only one compared telehealthwith face-to-face treatment; the second one compared telehealth with postal treatment. The other two studies are follow-up and cost analysis reports on telehealth versus postal evaluation. Data showed that women who received the intervention remotely presented significant improvement in their symptoms, such as reducing the number of incontinence episodes and voiding frequency, improving PFM strength and improving quality of life compared to women who had the face-to-face treatment. Conclusions Telehealth promoted a significant improvement in urinary symptoms, PFM function and quality of life. Telehealth is still emerging, and more studies are needed to draw more conclusions. The recommendations of the governmental authorities, physical therapy councils and corresponding associations of each country also need to be considered.-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04588-8-
Aparece nas coleções:Artigos de Periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.